This is the first in a series of “What a Corporate Transformation is Not.”
We look forward to sharing our knowledge and experience with you.
This is the first in a series of “What a Corporate Transformation is Not.”
We look forward to sharing our knowledge and experience with you.
Many institutions have undertaken expense reduction programs under the branding of “transformation”. While these efforts are useful to fund a true corporate transformation, these strategies are not transformational.
A low-cost offshore location strategy is a proven method to reduce expenses. However, it requires an upfront investment in staff, training, real estate and other infrastructure as well as one time severance cost. We generally utilize a benchmark of an 18–24 month payback period.
We group location strategies into two buckets: a “clean” drop and a “dirty” drop. A dirty drop moves a process as it currently exists and is effectively a salary arbitrage. A clean drop is moving a process AFTER it has been re-engineered. With a clean drop, an organization gets two levels of cost benefits; a more efficient process with reduced risk and salary arbitrage.
While a relocation strategy gives an organization immediate benefits through reduced cost, there are a number of risks including:
In summary, a low-cost location strategy can be an excellent tactic to free up investment dollars to fund a true corporate transformation. The strategy requires a high degree of research, planning and project management with crisp execution to assure benefits are maximized while risk is mitigated. A low cost location strategy should not be a stand alone cost reduction initiative but one that is aligned and part of a firm’s overall strategic direction and aligned with the target operating model.
Stay tuned for the next post in the series, “No Automation Without Obliteration”.